You're right! The more I think about it, the more I dislike them! Yesterday, I hadn't read any blurbs or plots...but now I have, I don't like the idea much at all. As you say, the Ladybird books didn't do this, as they weren't associated with any particular author. I believe they used original illustrations and rewrote the text, which made them clever and amusing - but these Famous Five ones sound like they will be anything but!Tony Summerfield wrote:I still get letters and emails from children thinking that Enid Blyton is alive, here is one I got two days ago:-
hi iam a big fan of your books and I would like to ask a few questions
q1, will you be writing any more far away tree books?
q2, what book was your favourite to write ?
q3, how many more books are you still going to write?
q4,what is your favourite book that you read as a child ?
Surely if new Famous Five books come out, just looking at the cover is going to make some think that these books are new books written by Enid Blyton. In my opinion this is disgraceful use of a dead author's name, surely the Ladybird books didn't do that.
I guess, having written a Famous Five book recently, and knowing a few other people who have written their own versions over the years, it's quite annoying that the publishers hope to cash-in on the Ladybird book success by dirtying the name of the Famous Five. There are so many authors out there who could have written these better...and now I realise they have been written by so-called humorist Bruno Vincent (who's most famous book is called 'Do Ants Have ****holes?' I don't think they will be funny in any way.
Instead of a parody, why didn't they have someone write something affectionately amusing, aimed at an adult audience. Do adults really only find booze and sex and diseases funny?!
Looking at some of the plots, I'm wondering whether they will have Julian accused of sexual assult, or perhaps Timmy will get shot and put into a stew, as it might be quite hilarious! That's how low I think these 'parodies' might go.